Minami Tamaki LLP Partners Minette Kwok, B. Mark Fong, Olivia Serene Lee, Suhi Koizumi, and Senior Counsel Dale Minami were selected by their peers for inclusion in the 27th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America.
Minette, Olivia, and Suhi were selected for inclusion in the practice area of Immigration Law. It is Minette’s seventh, Olivia’s fourth, and Suhi’s second listing on The Best Lawyers in America rankings.
Dale and Mark were selected for the Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs list for the eighth year in a row.
These individual awards qualify Minami Tamaki LLP for consideration by the U.S. News/Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” list.
The firm has been recognized six times on the “Best Law Firms” rankings, which are based on a rigorous evaluation process that includes the collection of client and lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process.
Best Lawyers is a respected peer review publication in the legal profession. Recognition in Best Lawyers is widely regarded by both clients and legal professionals as a significant honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers.
The Best Lawyers lists of outstanding attorneys are compiled by conducting exhaustive peer review surveys in which tens of thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. If the votes for an attorney are positive enough for recognition in Best Lawyers, that attorney must maintain those votes in subsequent polls to remain in each edition.
Lawyers are not permitted to pay any fee to participate in or be recognized by Best Lawyers.
Minami Tamaki is receiving inquiries from
employees, consumers, businesses, and community members regarding a wide range
of legal issues related to coronavirus (COVID-19) in the San Francisco Bay
Area. Recognizing the need for reliable
information and assistance, Minami Tamaki has formed a Coronavirus (COVID-19) Task Force to address legal issues arising
in the ongoing pandemic.
The Minami Tamaki Coronavirus (COVID-19) Task Force is addressing issues including:
Employee Rights. Providing information to employees regarding sick leave entitlement, wage and hour issues, unemployment benefits, telecommuting issues, layoffs / furloughs / shutdowns / reduced schedules, and WARN Act compliance.
Health and Safety. Addressing public health issues related to wearing masks at work, OSHA compliance, and retaliation for raising issues regarding employer obligation to provide a safe workplace.
Refunds for Cancelled Events and Memberships. Investigating legal action regarding cancelled concerts and festivals (including tickets purchased through sites such as StubHub and Ticketmaster), cancelled professional sports, gym memberships, and theme park memberships.
Price Gouging. Taking action against sellers who have raised prices on major necessities to excessive levels to extract profits from consumers.
Business Interruption Insurance Claims. Counseling policy holders on insurance coverage of business losses due to coronavirus. While some insurance policies exclude pandemics, other policy holders may be able to seek coverage protecting against economic losses.
Commercial Contracts. Advising clients on contractual issues, including “force majeure” clauses and whether parties are excused from performance of duties.
If you have questions regarding legal issues
arising from the ongoing pandemic, you may contact the Minami Tamaki
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Task Force online or call us at 415-788-9000.
*The contents of this article are for informational
purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Readers should
contact a licensed California attorney to obtain advice with respect to any
particular legal matter. Information on this website may not constitute the
most up-to-date legal or other information.
Use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship
between the reader and Minami Tamaki LLP.
Congressman Ted Lieu of California’s 33rd Congressional District authored an op-ed published by The Washington Post on March 18, 2020.
Related: The Asian Pacific Policy and Planning Council (A3PCON) and Chinese for Affirmative Action (CAA) have launched the Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center in response to spreading xenophobia as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. If you have experienced harassment and/or discrimination, visit a3pcon.org/stopaapihate to file a confidential report.
I genuinely want President Trump to succeed in stopping the spread of the novel coronavirus, and will do everything I can to help him in this effort. At stake are the lives of my elderly parents, my family, my constituents and many Americans. But Trump’s repeated insistence on calling coronavirus the “Chinese virus” is more than just xenophobic; it causes harm both to Asian Americans and to the White House’s response to this life-threatening pandemic. I served on active duty in the U.S. military to defend the right of any American to make politically incorrect statements, but as a public figure, I cannot stand idly by while the president uses his pulpit to exacerbate xenophobia in a time of crisis.
Trump claims that in using the phrase “Chinese virus,” he’s just trying to be “accurate” in describing where it’s from. But there is a difference between saying the virus is from China and saying it is a Chinese virus. In a time of unease and uncertainty, such language stokes xenophobic panic and doesn’t get us closer to eradicating this virus. Asian Americans have been assaulted or otherwise discriminated against because of such rhetoric. In New York, a man assaulted an Asian woman wearing a face mask and called her a “diseased b—h.” Also in New York, a man on the subway sprayed an Asian passenger with Febreze and verbally abused him. On the subway in Los Angeles, a man ranted at an Asian American woman, claiming Chinese people are putrid and responsible for all diseases. (The woman happened to be Thai American.)
Trump’s rhetoric adds fuel to the growing fire of hatred being misdirected at Asian Americans. The fact that he is the president of the United States, who is responsible for the well-being of all Americans, only makes his rhetoric even more disturbing. The leaders of both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization have warned that we should not use terms such as “Chinese virus.” The novel coronavirus already has an official name, SARS-CoV-2, and an unofficial name, covid-19. Injecting an ethnic qualifier to the virus is unnecessary and can stigmatize Asian Americans.
Against the backdrop of Trump’s unnecessary language lies the history of discrimination against Asian Americans in our country. From the Chinese Exclusion Act to the internment camps of World War II to the murder of Vincent Chin, Asian Americans are particularly susceptible to being discriminated against by the mistaken belief that we somehow are foreigners or have foreign ties.
On January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy
Act (“CCPA”), the most comprehensive privacy legislation in the United States, will
go into effect.
In the internet age, businesses collect an enormous amount of data about consumers. This includes identification, health, biometric, geolocation, credit and financial information. Unfortunately, as the level of collection has grown, the hacking and unauthorized use of such data has also increased dramatically.
The CCPA is designed to provide protection to
California consumers by: 1) limiting unauthorized disclosures and losses of
personal information; 2) giving consumers control of their personal
information; and 3) penalizing businesses for violations.
California residents will have new rights regarding access
to, deletion of, and sharing of their personal consumer data. Consumers will
have the right to request disclosure of the categories and specific personal
information being collected by the business, and the right to request disclosure
of the business or commercial purpose of collecting the personal information. Consumers can request that companies selling
or disclosing their personal information for a business purpose disclose the
identity of the third parties to whom their information is sold or
Further, California residents will also have the right
to request to opt out of the sale of their personal information, barring a few
exceptions. The CCPA has specific requirements when it comes to the personal
information of children, requiring that businesses obtain opt-in consent from
children between ages of 13-16, and the opt-in consent of the parent or
guardian of a child under 13 years of age before selling their personal
California residents can also request that businesses
delete the personal information, subject to certain restrictions.
The CCPA requires that businesses implement reasonable
security procedures to protect consumer information. If there is a breach of
that duty, e.g., if a California consumer’s personal information is subject to
unauthorized access, theft, or disclosure, the CCPA provides a private right of
action for a consumer to recover damages in an amount between $100 and $750 or
actual damages, whichever is greater. Businesses cannot discriminate against a
California resident for exercising any of their rights under the CCPA.
The CCPA requires compliance by for-profit businesses
that: 1) have an annual gross revenue of at least $25 million; 2) buy, receive,
sell, or share consumer data from 50,000 or more consumers, households, or
devices; or 3) gain a majority of their annual revenue from the selling of
The Attorney General of California is currently in the
process of drafting and finalizing the regulations pertaining to the California
Consumer Privacy Act. Moreover, the U.S.
Senate is also considering a comprehensive piece of legislation regarding
For more information on the California Consumer
Privacy Act, you may contact Minami Tamaki at (415) 788-9000 or through our online form.
*The contents of this website are intended to convey
general information only, and does not constitute legal advice.
UPDATE (01/02/2014) – The California Supreme Court rules Sergio C. Garcia can be admitted to the state bar. Minami Tamaki LLP was one of the firms representing the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California with respect to the Bar’s recommendation to the high Court that Garcia be allowed to become a lawyer. Read the ruling here: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S202512.PDF
Garcia, who was brought to the United States by his undocumented immigrant parents when he was 17 months old, has earned a law degree and passed the California State Bar Examination and moral character check. His application was certified to the California Supreme Court for review. The Court issued an order asking for clarification of several issues related to the practice of law by undocumented immigrants.
Minami Tamaki LLP was one of the firms representing the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California with respect to the Bar’s recommendation to the high Court that Garcia be allowed to become a lawyer. The Committee of Bar Examiners’ brief argues that state and federal laws permit Sergio Garcia to be licensed as an attorney in California. Also on the brief were Professor Emeritus Bill Ong Hing, attorneys from the State Bar of California, the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and UC Davis School of Law Dean Kevin R. Johnson.
We want to make sure you do not miss the announcement of the historic settlement of one of our cases that could mean $25, $100, $200 or more in your pocket.
Since 2007, Minami Tamaki partner Jack Lee has served as the Court-appointed Liaison Counsel for consumers, known as “indirect purchasers,” in a class action against ten leading international companies for unlawfully conspiring to fix prices of LCD panels used in laptops, desktop monitors, and flat screen televisions. The case is IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL Case No. 1827, pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco.
The indirect purchasers we represent include individual and private companies in 24 states and the District of Columbia that purchased laptops, monitors, and TVs containing LCD panels for use (and not for resale) from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2006.
This litigation has resulted in settlements totaling approximately $1.1 billion, the largest amount ever obtained for consumers who bought products indirectly from retailers and resellers, and not directly from the original manufacturer. The net proceeds of the settlement, after attorneys’ fees and costs, will be distributed to consumers and businesses that submit claim forms.
We believe it is likely that you, like tens of millions of other consumers, may have purchased one or more of the products at issue in this case during the seven year period that the price-fixing occurred. We hope that you will take advantage of the opportunity to recover any unlawful overcharges you paid as a result of this conspiracy.
Consumers and businesses in the District of Columbia and the following 24 states are eligible to participate in this settlement: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, West Virginia and Wisconsin.
Eligibility requirements and instructions on the claims process are available online at the web site: https://lcdclass.com/Home.aspx.The deadline for filing claims is December 6, 2012. Eligible consumers will be able to collect $25, $100, $200 or more by answering a few simple questions about the number of LCD flat screen TVs, monitors, and laptops they bought from 1999 to 2006. The exact amount of each payment will depend upon the number of products purchased and the number of claims filed. No receipts or other documents are required for small claims.
We believe that the eligibility requirements and claims process described on the web site are clear and simple. However, if you have questions or would like assistance in preparing your claim, we invite you to contact our toll-free LCD help line at 1-855-225-1886 or via e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org.
While Minami Tamaki LLP is pleased to announce this settlement and to have played a substantial role in this momentous litigation, we will ultimately measure our success by the benefits actually received by consumers eligible to share in the proceeds, including our friends and clients. We are therefore notifying you of this opportunity, urging you to submit your claim, and offering whatever assistance you feel you may need to realize the maximum benefit available to you. We also encourage you to pass this information on to your friends, family members, and colleagues who may be interested in making claims for their share of this settlement.
Partner Brad Yamauchi (back row, second from left) and his wife, Diane Gunderson ( back row, left ), joined an Aug. 28 celebration of Nancy Pelosi’s 25 years of service in Congress. Brad is a board vice president of the Japanese Cultural and Community Center of Northern California (JCCCNC), one of the organizational members of the event host committee. Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (back row, second from right) was the first woman Speaker of the House.
On August 20, 2012, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California preliminarily approved the class action settlement reached by the parties in Akaosugi v. Benihana National Corp., Case No. 11-cv-01272 (WHA).
The Settlement Class, which consists of current and former employees of Benihana-branded teppanyaki-style restaurants in California, alleged that Benihana required employees to forfeit vacation pay in violation of California wage laws. Benihana denies any wrongdoing, and the Court has not made any finding on the merits of the claims. The parties’ settlement remains subject to final Court approval.
Lewis Feinberg is co-counsel for the class along with Minami Tamaki LLP. A court-approved notice of the proposed settlement will be mailed by October 3, 2012. A final approval hearing will be held on January 24, 2013.
Senior Associate La Verne Ramsay in the Minami Tamaki LLP Immigration Practice Group will be a featured speaker at a CLE event on “Advanced Issues in PERM Labor Certifications” presented by the American Immigration Lawyers Association Northern California Chapter.
Also featuring Lisa Spiegel, a partner at Duane Morris LLP, the CLE event will be on Tuesday, May 29, 2012, at Duane Morris LLP, One Market Plaza, Spear Tower, Suite 2200, San Francisco. Cost is $30 in advance and $40 at the door if space is available. This is an AILA NorCal members-only event. AILA NorCal is a State Bar of California approved provider. For more information, please contact Olivia Lee or Angela Mapa at email@example.com.